Grading Deadlines
Accurate and timely grades play an important role in students’ professional development and professional prospects. Faculty are required to submit their grades each semester by the specified deadline, which is three weeks after the end of the exam period.
Grade Normalization
The Sturm College of Law employs the letter grade system set forth below:
| Letter Grade | Numerical Grade |
| A | 4.0 |
| A- | 3.7 |
| B+ | 3.3 |
| B | 3.0 |
| B- | 2.7 |
| C+ | 2.3 |
| C | 2.0 |
| C- | 1.7 |
| D+ | 1.3 |
| D | 1.0 |
| D- | 0.7 |
| F | 0.0 |
Grades issued in all required courses must correspond to a median of 3.3 and a mean between 3.15 and 3.45. Grades issued in all non-required non-clinical courses with an enrollment of more than ten students must substantially conform to this mandatory curve, meaning that they cannot deviate more than 0.1 from the mandatory median and mean.
If the grades issued in a course of more than 10 students substantially deviate from the mandatory curve, the faculty member must provide the Executive Associate Dean of Academic Affairs with adequate justification for the deviation. The Executive Associate Dean shall make the final determination of whether an adequate justification exists, taking into account the justification offered by the faculty member, the treatment of students in similarly situated classes across the curriculum, and other relevant factors bearing on horizontal equity and curricular integrity. If the Executive Associate Dean determines that adequate justification does not exist, the faculty member, the Executive Associate Dean, or the Registrar shall reconfigure the grades in a manner consistent with the grading requirements set forth herein.
Grade Finality
Grades are final unless there is a computational error. If a student wishes to appeal their grade, they should follow the procedures set out in the Student Handbook for appeal to the Examinations, Standing, and Readmission Committee.
In certain cases, faculty members may adopt a procedure that permits students to challenge provisional grades on individual assignments and exams. Faculty members who adopt this approach must make this policy known to all students at the beginning of the semester and must preserve anonymity throughout any reevaluation process. Such faculty-specific procedures, should they occur, do not involve the participation of the Registrar’s Office or the Examinations, Standing, and Readmission Committee.